🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of nations are considering comparable measures.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our children's youth". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on the legislature to pass a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good starting point," stated one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government vowed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and suitable for minors," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state government level amid national gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures requiring adult authorization for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this global discussion continues, the policies of this nation and others show that governments around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.